Students should evaluate the performance of their teachers

Essay topics:

Students should evaluate the performance of their teachers.

Some people believe that students should not evaluate their teacher’s performance. They claim that it can bring stress to the teachers and make them lose confidence. However, in my opinion, I agree that students should evaluate the performance of their teachers. I will explain my viewpoint with following two reasons.
First of all, students are the ones who can most accurately find out about their teacher’s strengths and weaknesses. One of the reasons for this is because teachers spend most of their time with students. Even though they spend quite a lot of time with their peers or superiors, we can’t ignore that class times are longer than breaks, eventually making them spend time with their students the most. For example, it is not exaggerating to say that in Korea, the teachers who takes charge in classes of 3rd grade high school students spend almost every time of the day except sleeping time with their students. Due to such a long period of time spent with their teachers, the students can assess their teachers very well in a variety kind of aspects. Thus, it is reasonable to say that evaluation by students is somewhat more precise than evaluation of other persons.
Second of all, regarding the objective of teachers which is teaching educational contents to the students, they need to develop their teaching through evaluation of their listeners. Subjects and topics can be changed as time passes, in cases as when government changes the education curriculum or a new information is discovered by researchers. Sometimes, the trends of student’s characteristics or methods of delivering contents change also. In order to keep up with these changes and better improve the classes’ contents, teachers need through feedbacks from their students. For example, in my university, my professor changed the contents of his class completely in one semester after receiving negative feedbacks in former semester. Overall, these evaluations can be conducive to teachers in improving their classes for the future.
To conclude, whether evaluation by students to their teachers can be a controvertible topic depending on people. Some argue that students can not provide a fair, precise assessment or such evaluation is unnecessary because it can damage teachers. However, I still contend that evaluation by students is required because students are the most informed entities about his or her teachers and evaluations are beneficial in helping teachers improve their classes.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 630, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with their students. Due to such a long period of time spent with their teachers, the students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...r methods of delivering contents change also. In order to keep up with these changes...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mproving their classes for the future. To conclude, whether evaluation by stude...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29722921914 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84242836657 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506297229219 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.485672629 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.684210526 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500749652401 0.236089414692 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185479057672 0.076458572812 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148510087327 0.0737576698707 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35243209282 0.150856017488 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116796805408 0.0645574589148 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 630, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with their students. Due to such a long period of time spent with their teachers, the students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...r methods of delivering contents change also. In order to keep up with these changes...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mproving their classes for the future. To conclude, whether evaluation by stude...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, regarding, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29722921914 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84242836657 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506297229219 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.485672629 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.684210526 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500749652401 0.236089414692 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185479057672 0.076458572812 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148510087327 0.0737576698707 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35243209282 0.150856017488 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116796805408 0.0645574589148 181% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.