for a successful developement of a country it is more important for the government to spend money on education of very young children than to spend money on universities
Nowadays many experts believe that one of the most important factors for the progress and prosperity of a country in the long run is the modification and improvement of basic educational systems. Novel descendent of a country will change the future of a country based on their science, technology, and behavior. To some extent, I believe that the modification of basic levels is more important than a higher level and we will see the results of this change in the future.
To begin with, it is an important point that the behavior, ethics, culture and all of the characteristic of children<span class="hiddenSpellError" pre="children "></span> in lower ages so by investing money on improving these main properties a country will have best people in the future. One research in the college of psychology in Chinese university revealed that the children who had better schools and teachers in their elementary school had a higher chance to become prosperous people in their society and they had a chance to control main systematic works in the country. Additionally, children in low age are affected by their adults and teachers which allow them to choose their future characteristic. visiting different teachers in school that are very prosperous and kind simulates them for trying hard to be one person with best behavior and life, therefore, training by best people in schools help them to receive to their best goals.
On the other hand, young students in universities are in the decades of innovating and choosing their future works so they also need to be considered by the government to continue to their educational life. Many of graduated students need governmental support to begin their company which works based on their university science and it will help to society by solving basic problems and full filling basic needs.
in conclusion, by considering all of the above debates, it is very good and constructive for all countries to invest the main budget on educating of children who are in the flourishing age and form their characteristic based on their learning in schools but this attention to young children should not distract government attention from graduate students who need financial support for beginning a professional job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... that the behavior, ethics, culture and all of the characteristic of children ^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 731, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Visiting
... to choose their future characteristic. visiting different teachers in school that are v...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 851, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the best'.
Suggestion: with the best
...s them for trying hard to be one person with best behavior and life, therefore, training ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...problems and full filling basic needs. in conclusion, by considering all of the a...
^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...c needs. in conclusion, by considering all of the above debates, it is very good and cons...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20435967302 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35167142507 2.67179642975 125% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482288828338 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.1109168457 48.9658058833 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.0 100.406767564 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.7 20.6045352989 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196339150428 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076724171085 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482711924307 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123237746674 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431915733232 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 11.7677419355 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 58.1214874552 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.1575268817 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.