teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays
Based on many people's opinion teaching is a high level job in society because they train the children and young people to become prosperous in their life. Nowadays, many reasons cause that this opinion declines and people do not respect teachers as past. To some extent I agree that all of us do not praise them so they do not encourage well for training of youth.
First, today many university students who studied some major especially some majors that are not related to school's lesson can hire in educational system and become a teacher. Easily access to this job increase the number of teachers who do not have required science and skill for this position. For example, some graduated students who studied history in university now teach math or other irrelevant lessons so they cannot fulfill the required science which children want to learn.
Second, the decline of the income and facilities which associated to teachers play an important role in declining the teaching quality so they do not have any incentive to their work. Decreasing of their incentive conducive to decrease of their teaching quality. Consequently people do not admire and praise their work and endeavor for training of future descendent in society.
finally, in most society government associate high level of equipment and best situations to universities rather than schools so the fundamental requirement of teachers for having an ideal teaching quality do not fulfill so the rate of learning in children decrease and their parents think that their teachers do not work well. Parents usually think that just teachers play a role in improving of their child in school. They never think that each lesson required associated materials and tools to be taught by teachers. For example the teachers need chemistry lab to show the children the way which materials combine to each other.
in conclusion, many factors such as low-income teachers and insufficient science and skill of new teachers furthermore loss of fundamental teaching requirement decrease the teachers work quality so they will not admire in society as before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... to decrease of their teaching quality. Consequently people do not admire and praise their w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...ining of future descendent in society. finally, in most society government associate h...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "required associated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'associating' or 'to be associated'.
Suggestion: associating; to be associated
...y never think that each lesson required associated materials and tools to be taught by tea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...which materials combine to each other. in conclusion, many factors such as low-in...
^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y will not admire in society as before.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15160349854 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62576222051 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495626822157 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4615893366 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.214285714 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126328287905 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498400331127 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036319775115 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841811771458 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389278910236 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.