because people are busy doing so many different thing they do very few thing well
Hectic life force people to do different things because it is essential for them to fulfill their necessities. There also have been two contrasting attitude toward this, while some believe that the high volume of their work cause many defeats, other adhere to the idea that doing so many things is not a logical reason for people's weak performance. To some extent I subscribe to the idea that people should do much of their work well instead of their busy life.
To begin with, many people used to live in metropolitan cities and they know all complex aspects of their life, hence, planning for their daily work help them to have a convenient performance. They can find their mistakes and solve them gradually. Dealing with so many problems and actions need some management skill that people should learn it well. To shed light on this matter, I want to bring up an example of an activity in which I was involved. In the second year of bachelor studies at university, I force to do many projects and research that was like many duties that people should do in their real life. I have a special plan for each work to them well without error. Finally I could prepare them well on time and got good grades at the end of semester. This example aptly illuminates how important and beneficial it is to control all responsibilities according to the personal plans.
Another equally noteworthy point to be mentioned is that when we know the exact time for proposing our work, we should divide them into separate and small parts to do them well. Dividing a big problem to some small parts always help us to pay attention to special details and modify our errors. For instance, The Asian educational society found that about 80 percent of children can do difficult work well when their teachers ask them to do step by step and by considering the effect of a small part to prosperous of final work. It clarify for us that like domino game we should put all actions well beside another action do release our mistakes.
In brief, based on the aforementioned reasons one can logically draw the conclusion that by having a plan relevant to a tsk people can do their work well instead of their busy life. All in all, it is highly recommended that dividing big work to small part helps people to do them better by considering lateral aspects of each work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 513, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...bachelor studies at university, I force to do many projects and research that was lik...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...r each work to them well without error. Finally I could prepare them well on time and g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clarifies'?
Suggestion: clarifies
...ll part to prosperous of final work. It clarify for us that like domino game we should ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63461538462 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48285541382 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512019230769 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3124761 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289511961262 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100002098132 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811709703786 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194761263341 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878747219908 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.