: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.
The passage describes genetically modified foods which it states that they are more beneficial and lucrative that other foods and provides three reason of support. However the professor this agree with the passage and claims that the profitability of genetic modified foods is not as clear as the author states and although they provide some benefits but they produce major drawbacks too, and refutes each of the authors reasons of support.
First the author claims that framers need centuries to produce better crops by selective breeding but researchers can today achieve this result faster than farmers because of the process of genetic modification. The professor claims that the improvement that we expect may take longer time than what we expect, for example, it can last about 100 years for researchers. Also the genetic modified foods are not always better or at least as stable as natural foods.
Second the passage states that these foods are safe and scientists use a form of testing called peer review to evaluate that their health degree, and they have shown that they are safe and no health risk is obtained from testing. However the professor claims that peer review helps the accuracy of the testing but many companies are unwilling to show all results because they have fear that their rivals copy their product so the scientists have don’t have the ability to test the products completely.
Finally the author describes that developing countries can have this chance to control food shortage and avoid famine by using genetic modified foods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s and provides three reason of support. However the professor this agree with the passa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n last about 100 years for researchers. Also the genetic modified foods are not alwa...
^^^^
Line 9, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...o health risk is obtained from testing. However the professor claims that peer review h...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...y to test the products completely. Finally the author describes that developing co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 52.1666666667 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 256.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18359375 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38759765425 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7283912186 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.875 100.406767564 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.6045352989 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0577393879688 0.236089414692 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251624878 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233554824525 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0336082398801 0.150856017488 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268985425843 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.