Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the lecture are about the laser vision correction. The reading claims that this procedure has a number of problems. On the contrary, the professor refutes points made in the reading, trying to prove them wrong and as a misconception from the author of the book.
First and foremost, the writer points out that one of the problems of laser vision correction is that surgery is expensive. Not everyone could afford that. However, the lecturer cannot disagree more, saying that recently the cost of eye surgery is reduced by thirty percent. Therefore, people could afford it. The professor elaborates further by saying that the cost is lowering because the cost of equipment went down and the number of eye surgeons is increased. As a result of competition, the price has decline.
The second argument the author gives is that problems after surgery could rise. For example, after the procedure cornea could be detached. Nevertheless, the lecturer declares that there were reported only few cases of this problem. The person who experienced cornea's detachment was climbing the mount of Everest. Consequently, the high altitude and the pressure cause that problem. Therefore, this issue is not effective for everyone.
Finally, the passage mentions the recovery time, which takes weeks and months, and that is inconvenient. On the other hand, the teacher explains that reports have shown that the recovery time is only two to three days. But, different people may react differently. Doctors have seen that the length of this correction has lasted about twenty years. This tells us that this procedure is beneficial for people who need eye correction.
In conclusion, the reading's points contrast with the lecturer's arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'corneas'' or 'cornea's'?
Suggestion: corneas'; cornea's
...his problem. The person who experienced corneas detachment was climbing the mount of Ev...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 281.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25978647687 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63901979452 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1786205512 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.380952381 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.380952381 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112000030279 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306852030176 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427500027696 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801331779052 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595298845364 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.