Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
A controversial issue relating to whether the universities should require all students to take public speaking courses or not, has brought to the attention of relevant people. Many people think that it is necessary that students learn how to give public speeches. However, in my opinion, not all students should take a public talking class.
First of all, taking public speaking course is a subject that is not preferred by every young adult. To put it in other words, there are students who are not inclined to develop this skill at all. For example, my brothers experience is a compelling example of this. When he was a child, he was a shy kid. Actually, that was one of the parts of his personality. One time his teacher selected him to give a speech in front of the class. He became very nervous and did not say anything to his teacher the way he felt because he was afraid of refusing teachers word. Consequently, when the lecturer called his name, he just fainted in front of the class. After that experience, he never attended any class that was related to any kind of speech. Thus, schools should consider the fact that not all students prefer to participate in these types of courses. That is why the universities should not make public speaking class mandatory for all young learners.
Furthermore, speaking in public is a quality that does not need to be taught. It is a talent. In fact, this skill could be detected since in childhood when kids are still in kindergarten. Actually, students who do posses this quality may want to improve it, then they will seek to attend these courses. For instance, my cousin has been a very ongoing person, friendly with everyone and not shy like my brother. When he grew up he liked to study about public relationships because he knew that would perform well in that field. He told me that only one semester that he had chosen contained classes that were related with public speech. He had the talent of giving the message that he wanted to people very clearly and without any problem. According to this, universities should live this course as an optional. Therefore, students who like these courses they will attend them.
In conclusion, universities should not request all students to attend public speak classes. This is because some young adults do not prefer to learn anything about speaking in public because of their personal reasons. And because students who do posses this quality will not need the class at all.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, furthermore, however, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, of course, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78321678322 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52968423511 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48951048951 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9287219083 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85185185185 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204253018197 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654232744531 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066098671769 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161780766275 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656218226192 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.