Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking
courses.
Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
In the modern-day, education plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching for many ways to enhance educational systems. A controversial question that deserves some words here is whether or not university compulsory students to take public speaking courses have provoked controversy among people. I assert that students will learn many social skills at the public discussion lessons, so I agree with this proposal. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
To commence with, one of the most significant proofs of this claim is that students need to speak fluently in the occupation and professional position in the future. To shed more light on this matter, I should say students will become an important person like an engineer, a doctor, a teacher, and many other similar ones in the not-so-distance future. Therefore, they must be able to speak fluently and transfer their ideas and notions clearly to the people who bond with them. The pupils learn those skills in academic situations definitely. For example, consider an indigenous engineer who works at a well-known computer company. Because of his high intelligence and creativity, he has enormous ideas that improve the company’s situation among other ones. Nevertheless, he cannot explain notions and ideas in the best ways; hence, all his talent is regarded by their managers.
The second and equally exquisite point of this assertion is that individuals become flexible among different ideas. To elaborate on this point, since students select the public discussion lessons, they learn how to defend their ideas, and how to tolerate opposite notions. In other words, people become flexible to the ideas which are on the opposite side of their own notions. This phenomenon assists them remarkably in their future careers since, in the modern era, numerous opinions exist for each topic; hence, it is important to become flexible and tolerant of them. For example, in the group project, members of a team must listen carefully to all ideas, and analysis of them. In this situation, if people are not tolerating drawback opinions about their own ideas, without any doubt, their project will become a failure.
All in all, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that the public speaking course must be obligatory for students to select. I believe that the public discussion lessons not only do prepare students to speak fluently in the occupation and professional position in the future but also that individuals become flexible among different ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...estion that deserves some words here is whether or not university compulsory students to take ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar-cut reasons will be discussed. To commence with, one of the most signif...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30969267139 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8061535428 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536643026005 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8357203834 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113046367063 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334322568138 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509752067934 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849283011934 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508437502535 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.