The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
I believe that living quality of people is an important responsibility of government. Thus, in my opinion, I agree with the statement that the surest indicator of a great nation is represented by the general welfare of its people.
Great nation could be represented by the general welfare of its people, such as education, because it means the government could provide a great basic living for the people. For example, the Taiwanese government requires each Taiwanese person to take the mandatory education for twelve years. The Taiwanese government provides lots of educational subsidies for everyone in Taiwan to ensure that every person has the same right to learn many useful subjects, such as math and history, in the schools. Thus, many poor people can utilize this precious chance to learn lots of professional knowledge to get a high scores and have a better opportunity to study in a great university to change their fates. By contrast, in some countries, the government does not offer educational subsidies for each person, then the students have to lend the loans to cover their tuition fees. These fees tend to be up to several thousand dollars per year, and it will be a heavy burden for each person in the United States. As a result, each person in the United States will be difficult to change their life by education.
Other general welfares, such as medicine, will be a suitable indicator of a great nation. For example, in Taiwan, when people go to see a doctor ,everyone can use a lower price to cure their diseases because the Taiwanese government require each person has to buy the medicine insurance provided by the government. Thus, some poor people will not need to worry about the price of treatment because the Taiwanese government will cover most of the medical fees for them, and these poor people can have the same rights to see a doctor as other rich people. Moreover, the Taiwanese government uses substantial resources to cultivate doctors ,nurses , and other medical professionals, then the people in Taiwan can use the cheapest price to have the best medical services. In contrast, in some countries, the people have to pay an astronomical amount of money for their medical bills because in these countries the government will not provide medical subsidies for the public.
As a result, these people tend to have to endure their serious pain brought by their diseases because they have no extra money to buy a medical insurance offered by private companies.
Indeed, some countries, such as North Korea and Soviet Union, use most of their national resources to develop technology and weapons, and then they have superior military ability than other countries. However, people in these countries usually suffer from poverty and diseases because the governments ignore people’s basic needs. Even if these countries have lots of powerful military weapons, their people can still not receive the basic welfares from their government. Therefore, in my opinion, these countries can not be called great nations.
Ideally, a great nation should develop lots of great arts, music, and technology and maintain the people’s basic welfares at the same time. However, the surest indicator of a great is the general welfare of its people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n Taiwan, when people go to see a doctor ,everyone can use a lower price to cure t...
^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...bstantial resources to cultivate doctors ,nurses , and other medical professionals...
^^
Line 5, column 645, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l resources to cultivate doctors ,nurses , and other medical professionals, then t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2736.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07606679035 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64624121965 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415584415584 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 869.4 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4468468166 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206872322728 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915869297014 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131242686672 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172381761292 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146652316296 0.0645574589148 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.