Would you prefer to go to a small university in the countryside or a large university in the city?
Everyone has his own preference for different university types. This will raise the question of whether a large university in the city surpasses a small university in the countryside. In my opinion, I will prefer to attend a large university in the city.
First of all, a large university in the city could provide me with plenty of more convenient transportation systems. My previous experience would be a suitable example. When I was an undergraduate, I left my hometown, Hsinchu city, and studied in Taipei city. In Taipei city, I could use lots of diverse types of traffic tools, like Ubike or MRT. For one thing, I will not be bothered by lacking traffic tools to commute because there will be many types of transporting tools for me, such as the Taipei Bus System. For another thing, I could also cut down the discharging amount of carbon dioxide by using public transportation systems, like public bikes or the subway. As a result, I could not only benefit myself but also make some difference to society. By contrast, if I choose to attend a small university in the countryside, I will not be able to use these extremely useful transportation systems.
Second, a large university in the city could broaden my vision by knowing many people from different countries. Take my previous experience, for example. When I was an undergraduate, I attend lots of different types of international clubs, like the English Speaking club. These clubs provided a bunch of opportunities to communicate with foreigners from all over the world, like Japan or Germany. Thus, I could use these precious chances to understand diverse cultures, like German Beer Festival or Japanese animation. Moreover, I could also discuss some historic events with them, like the rise and fall of the British Empire. On top of that, I could enlarge my vision by exchanging thoughts with these international students. In contrast, if I had chosen to study at a small university in the countryside, I would not have been capable of easily making friends with these foreign people and learning about their cultures.
To sum up, these are the two reasons why I choose to attend a large university in the city. On one hand, I could utilize a good deal of totally convenient transportation systems. On the other hand, I could also extend my vision by communicating with international students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...erent university types. This will raise the question of whether a large university in the city surpasse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing, I will not be bothered by lacking traffic tools to commute because there w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, thus, another thing, for example, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, for another thing, for one thing, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95226130653 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97754807358 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489949748744 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2474279509 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5909090909 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214626143852 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766288869353 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10673085829 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18061066828 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14640515949 0.0645574589148 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.