A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Parents send their children to schools to learn something useful. Teachers are the main important individual whom students spend most of their time with. So, they may effectively have the largest impact on their young students educating process. Some people think that teachers ability for establishing a strong relationship with students have the chief role here. However, some others suggest that teachers’ basic knowledge still should be considered more. I believe that today children needed more friends and people who can socialize them better for this developed complicated world.
First, our children require more group work and social act practices because most of the technological companies and other job offers demand a set of new skills which we have not needed and educated for them in our own time in the past. So, teachers should encourage their students for participating in the drills that help them with these skills and create enough motivation in them for pursuing this path. Learning simple facts and formulas alone like any other fellow peers would not benefit them in the future.
Secondly, school and its lessons and home works are not everything in a young person’s life. Eventually, they must come out of their schools and colleges and enter their vast society which has its own especial rules. So, teachers should try to relate well with their students to share their life experiences appropriately with them. For example, students may not talk about their friendship issues and getting bullied. But they may listen to their teachers’ advice about it.
Last but not least, if teachers insist more on learning the only information that were told by them, students think that they are obligated to do just that assignment. This finally kills the sense of creativity in the students in young ages and they may be trapped in some theories which would not help them anyway. Furthermore, this kind of system will have some teachers in the long period with limited skills that are the past days students who educated wrongly by teachers whom we are debating about.
In conclusion, education plays a vital role in our children’s future career and life. So, it is crucial for the teachers to know how they should treat their students and making bonds with them, since it can help them to benefit <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">more</span> from their time during school.
- summarize the points made in the lecture about fire measures, being sure to explain how they address the concerns about forest fires described in the reading. 75
- summarize the points made in the lecture about problems with possible theories made for animals sudden elimination explanation, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading about animals sudden extinction. 80
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? for success in future job and life the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard at school? give specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Does luck has anything to do with success? 60
- summarize the points made in the lecture about salts problem in sea, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific solutions provided in the reading for solving salts problem. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ucating process. Some people think that teachers ability for establishing a strong relat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e from their time during school.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20663265306 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87593016842 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4629887655 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.421052632 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183374460713 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677058834038 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554262506943 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116265081895 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446582340917 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.