summarize the points made in the lecture about bees' fossils and their existence time, Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about fossils of bees found.
The reading discusses about the doubts concerning bees’ existance in wildlife of 200 million years ago. However, the professor in the lecture believes that bees could perfectly be existed 200 million years ago. She opposes with the reading's standpoint and gives three reasons to refute each of the explanations proposed in the passage respectively.
First, the article argues that no significant fossils of actual bees have been ever discovered that could be attributed to 200 million years ago. But, the professor disagrees with this view and reminds that fossil of bees are so hard to be preserved, since they should be kept inside an especial resin which is only produced by one kind of tree that predicted to be rarely found during those years. Therefore, it would be normal to find so much little remaining of bee fossils today.
Second, the passage states that bees could not be lived 200 million years ago, because there were not any flowering plants present in that period which bees could possibly feed on them. In contrary, professor illustrates that although bees are known to use flowering plants as a food source today, they may fed on non-flowering plants like pines during that period of time. They might be evolved and adapted to flowering plants after their apearance in later times.
Third, the reading explains that most of the excavated fossils of bees in Arizona region represent only general aspects of bees and lacks the details which can strongly help scientists in determining the exact time of the fossils. On the other hand, she thinks that there plenty of chemical evidence used for water proofing by bees that support bees existence during 200 million years ago, since same kind of chemical substance was found in other fossils analyzed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
...million years ago. She opposes with the readings standpoint and gives three reasons to r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...lants present in that period which bees could possibly feed on them. In contrary, professor il...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...flowering plants like pines during that period of time. They might be evolved and adapted to f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 346, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...for water proofing by bees that support bees existence during 200 million years ago,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07823129252 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44178127658 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9636534732 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283142669201 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115995877066 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470126314261 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173321346419 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351133066288 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.