teachers are less appreciated or valued today rather than in the past
With increasing opportunities to be educated, the interesting discussion about whether teachers are less appreciated or valued today rather than in the past is on the air. As far as I am concerned, teachers may be less appreciated or valued today with the limit access to education in the past or some traditional rules in China.
Most importantly, owing to the limit access to be educated, the education was regarded as a privilege for the blue blood or the rich. The blue blood or rich is more likely to be polite and in a good manner to maintain their family fame. Also, the longer teaching period or number of students plays a role on more honoring teacher in the past. Unlike one teacher for one subject today, the well-educated teacher would be usually invited to teach children about all the subjects for a long period. On the contrary, nowadays, many teachers only teach a class for one semester in the school. Besides, the number of students in the class now generally is around 50, at least five times as the past time. Therefore, it could more difficult to develop a deeper and stronger relationship between student and teacher today rather than in the past.
Additionally, the tradition or manner of honoring teacher and respecting his teacher had instilled in Chinese mind deeply in the past. As an old saying goes, "a teacher of one day is a father of a whole life." It can indicate that the ancient Chinese regards the honored teachers as important as their fathers. As many people in the past did not go to school or read a book, everything taught by the teacher is so valuable that people cannot get in touch for a whole life. Therefore, the students will listen to the instruction from teachers as same as from their fathers, and thus the status of teacher in the past is really high. On the contrary, regarding teacher as important as the father seems to be too excessive for students today. All the tradition or manner of honoring teacher, which seems to be old-fashion, cannot be seen in school.
Admittedly, some teachers in the past could not receive enough pay for supporting their living, especially during the war, but they had received much respect and honor from their students, due to the limit access to education in the past or some traditional rules in China. For example, Liu Bei, a king of the country named Shu, took three visits to the broken cottage for getting the help from a honored teacher and smart advisor-Zhu Ge Liang.
All in all, it seems to be safe to conclude that teachers are less appreciated or valued today rather than in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'would' and 'be'.
Suggestion: would usually be
...ubject today, the well-educated teacher would be usually invited to teach children about all the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...s around 50, at least five times as the past time. Therefore, it could more difficult to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...roken cottage for getting the help from a honored teacher and smart advisor-Zhu G...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, really, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61312119253 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465934065934 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.7890055835 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420011052243 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157006439072 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166332292872 0.0737576698707 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322784100149 0.150856017488 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.203792925488 0.0645574589148 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.