Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Having social or political views of our own is a natural phenomenon as we are human. However, it is important that teachers keep themselves reserve enough so that students of them do not get any inkling about their outlooks toward the society or politics.
To begin with, environment needed for education become frustrated if teachers express their views regarding the society or politics to their students. For improvement of a country it is essential that the educational institutions of that country remain free from politics. Students get infulenced by their teachers as they follow their footprints. So it is unfortunate that a teacher is sharing his thoughts of the society with young learners. When I was an undergraduate student, some of my teachers used to express their political views to us. Eventually many of my friends become influenced by them, and got themselves involved in disgusting politics of our country. As a students it is our duty to get ourseleves involved in attending the classes, doing research, and participate in cocurricular activities. But their presence in political meeting and semniars prhoibited my friends from concentrating on their studies. As a result, they failed in their courses; ultimately it took more of their times to graduate. If the teachers had not shared political views with us, those friends of mine would have able to complete their study on time and would be able to earn money to support their family.
Scondly, the academic activities of an institution are obstructed by the teahers who share their social or political outlook with their stduents. Not only students get involved in clash among themselves about their political views, the teachers also find themselves arguing against each other, which ultimately destructs the academic progress of the institution. For instance, the institution where I am in has some teachers of opposite view points, and they spread divergent opinions about society among the students. Consequently, discord among the teachers occur often times, which leave the isntiution in a situation that the academic activites get hampered. Most often, on any vital decision about the institution, they found themselves in opposite side of the river which hamstrung the decision making process; students are the ultimaltey losers by the way.
In conclusion, teachers should never be explicit enough to their students abount their social or political inclination. It hampers the future of the students and sometimes stem the progress of educational institutions, and ultimately the countries get affected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s keep themselves reserve enough so that students of them do not get any inkling ...
^^
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
... disgusting politics of our country. As a students it is our duty to get ourseleves involv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 966, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a result, they failed in their courses; ultimately it took more of their times t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, by the way, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34803921569 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92415006365 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.698100939 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.842105263 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406766877113 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134895680092 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963319385971 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264895926707 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467484665866 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.