Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
In today’s hustle and bustle world, it is no secret to anyone that every person views the world through his or her eyes, meaning that everyone has a different view of a point compared to others in various matters. It is noteworthy that there have been several factors that influence one’s views and opinions such as parents, teachers, friends, media and so forth. In this vein, there has been a controversial debate among psychologists about this notion that whether teachers should expose their social and political opinions in the classroom or they deny doing. I firmly maintain that teachers as the building blocks of one’s personality should not make their social and political perspectives overt to students. My viewpoint is based on a few reasons; two compelling ones of which have been elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, it can be as an impediment for students to extend their mind when teacher dictate or reveal their opinion or ideas to students. Students are in an era of their lives on which their personality and beliefs can be easily influenced by individuals and the situation, which they faced in their lives. It is noteworthy that students will be more likely to become a dependent and close-mind person in their near future if teachers make them no opportunities to stimulate and promote their mind. Under this situation, when teachers make their social and political perspectives known in the class, students learn only how to pretend and restate teachers’ the line of thought in the future without inferring from their opinions and beliefs by themselves. Imagine two classes, one class where has an active space so that teachers are not being allowed to state their social and political view before students reveal their opinions, and another class without such a situation in which teachers immediately make obvious their opinions. It is crystal clear that classes where provided students with opportunities to present their social and political views can make students more active in the class and eventually make them knowledgeable persons.
Furthermore, classes where students are allowed to express their social and political viewpoints without being clear teachers’ views and beliefs at the first can flourish students’ talent and help them to become successful persons not only in their future occupations but also in their lives. Even there are many jobs that need to individuals who can easily and elegantly declare their opinions and ideas about social and political matters, which means that people engaged in these vocations should have high expressive power in addition to sufficient required knowledge in order to succeed. In this vein, when teachers do not unmask their views, it provides students with opportunities to practice the situations are supposed to face. For instance, great politicians have surely learned in their graduation time how to foster their views and then disclose them to others. Had their teachers made their views obvious for them in the classroom, they would not have reached such a position at all.
In a nutshell, having considered all the aforementioned reasons, I concur with those who believe that teachers are not allowed to make their social and political viewpoints transparent to students. Not only does it provide students with opportunities to enhance their mind and become an open-minded person, but it can also help them succeed in their future jobs and lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 910, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to them'.
Suggestion: obvious to them
...rs. Had their teachers made their views obvious for them in the classroom, they would not have r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 13.8261648746 231% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2908.0 1977.66487455 147% => OK
No of words: 557.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22082585278 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85807034144 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69971394817 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457809694794 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 876.6 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.351552876 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.555555556 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9444444444 20.6045352989 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.519591788463 0.236089414692 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187385280325 0.076458572812 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102337067299 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331949277889 0.150856017488 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817866595798 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.