Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Whether teachers are more appreciated for past days than current is a long-running debate. Some argue that since none of child can grow without teachers, teachers should be more, or at least the same valued than past. However, considering the impact of new technologies, especially the Internet, combined with the change in the way of communication between parents and teachers, I believe that the teachers are gradually less valued by society.
First of all, the popular and successful technologies reduce the demand for teachers. Many information were only passing by speaking and listening before, can now be easily obtained from the Internet at anytime. More engaging fact is that the Internet can provide more relative knowledge than teachers simtimuiously. For instance, a student who is major in astronomy could wield the plentiful resources from the Internet to self-teaching him about classic music. He could also train himself to play viturial piano in websites without warry for paying the expensive piano teaching classes. The adventure of the Internet fundamentally changed the way people learning, and reduced the demand for teachers. Therefore, teachers lost their uniqueness, results in the decline of appreciation.
Moreover, the shift of communication way between parents and teachers is another critical reason for the decline of teachers's value. About ten years ago, when there was no modern applications which focus on instant message, the only way that parents could know about the behavior of their children in the school is the so called "parental meeting". Exquisite means reputation. Parents at that time had no choice but remain good relationship with teachers. Therefore, teachers are on average veneriable since every parents . However, the above scenario is totally different in today, since parents could wield various ways to communicate with teachers. They also have other sources to know about their children, even detailed than that of teachers provided. As a result, few parents will particulatly build nice relationship with teachers, and the number of appreciated parents are simtimuiously declined.
To sum up, the new technologies contribute to the reduce of teachers' value in modern society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...preciated for past days than current is a long-running debate. Some argue that since none of c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: Much; Little
...ologies reduce the demand for teachers. Many information were only passing by speaki...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: Much information; A good deal of information
...ologies reduce the demand for teachers. Many information were only passing by speaking and liste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n average veneriable since every parents . However, the above scenario is totally ...
^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... up, the new technologies contribute to the reduce of teachers value in modern society.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, at least, for instance, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53043478261 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95058821213 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8995508191 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.421052632 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21723300403 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694237797858 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875660650844 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147255358042 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939426948534 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.