Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
I partially disagree with the statement that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Technology is increasing everyday to a new level which itself is an example that the statement is not true.
Technology creates impulses in children to create something new. Children learn more new stuffs of their own interest independently and without major constraints due to techonology development. This development is not something AI robots created. Again, AI robots are a great example technology development. For example, the child who created the heart attack detector prior to the heart attack, so that people can save themselves in advance, was motivated by the Youtube videos he watched related to his interest. Technology actually lead children in the right path to dream and achieve something. A 13 year old programmer wouldn't have programmed a code game if he was not aware of what technology was. Now a days, classroom lessons are taught through E-learning which has made student's life more simpler than before. Computer facilities in schools has made programming more practical for Computer science graduates. Other fields of study also use computer for designing, calculating, presenting, etc. Even DJ's are working only because of technology. If not for technology, they couln't have any equipments.
Technology aslo includes games and other negative aspects which may affect children's creativity and get them addicted to it. But with right control and guidance that be stopped. People are so obsessed with technology for even simple matters. Completely stopping that activity of children will help one creatively think issues at hand with his own mind. That will develop interest and make him more furious to develop new stuffs in his interested field.Practical way of sudying using techology will help children develop new ideas and find their interest.
According to me, Creativity comes from individuality and interest level and technology has nothing to do with that. I partially disagree with the statement by suggesting that techonology perfectly handled by children can ameliorate creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e in the past. Technology is increasing everyday to a new level which itself is an examp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...eve something. A 13 year old programmer wouldnt have programmed a code game if he was n...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...e was not aware of what technology was. Now a days, classroom lessons are taught through E...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...s not aware of what technology was. Now a days, classroom lessons are taught through E...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'simpler' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: simpler
...E-learning which has made students life more simpler than before. Computer facilities in sch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Practical
...elop new stuffs in his interested field.Practical way of sudying using techology will hel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... new ideas and find their interest. According to me, Creativity comes from individuality an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43543543544 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89240482044 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600600600601 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8081201105 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1904761905 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.45110844103 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315622828135 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896774641038 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149650073913 0.0737576698707 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22340495921 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163209576865 0.0645574589148 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.