Most children now have commonly own game player, a personal mobile phone and they quickly came to be good at using those latest mechanics more than we did, especially gaming. Do such items totally capture children's creativity? I rather insist that it contributes to their creativity more flexible and diverse.
The greatest invention of technology, the computer is most convince source for children who happen to question about an unknown subject. For example, When one wonders what astronomy basically is as he's watching a TV show. He can search it on online and it quickly comes up a lot of the matching title by just typing in words belonging to it. In addition, he can employ its build-up knowledge later as an idea of drawing, cooking, crafting, and whatever he makes a thing.
Second, Playing games online is such famous among children. There are undoubtedly pro kids who spend half of his life with it. Playing games is nothing but taking a full of their brain because they crave to goal in as fast as possible. Hence, as well as my gamer friend and they tend to possess a variant imagination and views in their brain.
Last, children are easily capable of watching a movie, a music video, and a blogger daily online. Those contents of a video inspire them. Take an online blogger as an example. When one wants to be an artist in the future see a real aesthetic work on a video of an artist blogger, the emotion she felt as watching it will proceed her for the dream and she could get ideas of his to work on day by day.
This world gradually becomes being mechanized, technologized much more than decades ago. Its generation is wonderful enough to fit into it. I deeply wish their development with technology will long stable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Most children now have commonly own game player, a persona...
^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
... wonders what astronomy basically is as hes watching a TV show. He can search it on...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68954248366 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52760613467 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650326797386 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4441842304 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7222222222 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138960881515 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041406833666 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442566970612 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773023206447 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577800046337 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.