In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct
In today’s competitive and bustling world, how decision-making with a specific amount of try and error can play the most vital role in human’s success. There has been a controversial debate among people whether they should work quickly along with risk making mistake or work slowly with surely correct decision-making in order to succeed. I, personally speaking, concur with those who are proponents of working slowly and being sure that everything is correct. My opinion is based on a few reasons, two compelling ones of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, it is hard to deny that working slowly but steadily ensuring everything is implemented in the best way can make an opportunity for people to feel a sense of peace of mind, resulting in enhancing their self-confidence when they can envision the correct outcomes of their tasks they are engaging in. On the other hand, risk-taking which some things may go wrong has a devastating influence on one’s spirit, meaning that frequent failures resulted from thoughtless decision-making undermine individuals’ self-confidence. My own experience can be a transparent example of what I mean. When my brother and I accepted into a well-known university in our country, our father gave us a considerable amount of money as a reward. My brother, which has a risk-taking personality, immediately spent his share of the reward in a lottery match, resulting in he lost all of his money. However, I invested my quota step by step in a stock, a kind of investing that requires patience and sufficient knowledge. Although this way was slow and I was not willing to become affluent in just a moment as my brother thought, but I was assured that I will not be lost in any of the steps. This line of thought helped me to feel more confident in my works which made me a successful businessman now.
Furthermore, working in a slow manner and making sure that be along with correct results makes people more diligent, resulting in the work become more productive and fruitful. When people realize that the consequences of their working in a slower but correct way will be positive, they will endeavour more severe and allocate more time in order to reach a positive outcome. However, when people are willing to take a risk to reach quickly to uncertain results of their work, this uncertainty makes them despondent and loosens their persevere. It is a crystal clear that frustrated persons are akin to moving dead who the future and success have no value for them. Indeed, the possible failures and the uncertainty of the consequences of challenges that individuals take a risk when they face results in a lack of motivation in completing their tasks. As a result, the more people become sure of the consequences of their life, the more productive their work will be.
To put in a nutshell, having considered the aforementioned reasons and points into account, I think that working slowly and being sure that everything will go correct outweighs working quickly and taking risks. In this vein, not only can it bolster people’s self-confidence, but it also can make them more persevere resulting in the outcomes of their works becoming more productive.
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 73
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 73
- It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 94
- For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 88
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...cision-making with a specific amount of try and error can play the most vital role in h...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... personally speaking, concur with those who are proponents of working slowly and being ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 857, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in the lost'?
Suggestion: in the lost
...he reward in a lottery match, resulting in he lost all of his money. However, I invested m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a slow manner" with adverb for "slow"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...usinessman now. Furthermore, working in a slow manner and making sure that be along with corr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, i mean, i think, kind of, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 537.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9933616838 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500931098696 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0277285955 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.85 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370150581037 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116444979478 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117399282745 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271117052008 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100042451411 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...cision-making with a specific amount of try and error can play the most vital role in h...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... personally speaking, concur with those who are proponents of working slowly and being ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 857, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in the lost'?
Suggestion: in the lost
...he reward in a lottery match, resulting in he lost all of his money. However, I invested m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a slow manner" with adverb for "slow"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...usinessman now. Furthermore, working in a slow manner and making sure that be along with corr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, i mean, i think, kind of, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 537.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9933616838 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.500931098696 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0277285955 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.85 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370150581037 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116444979478 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117399282745 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271117052008 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100042451411 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.