Friends have an important rule in our lives to such an extent that some people believe our most common behaviors are retrieved from our closest friends. A plethora of people might incline toward the notion that we should keep our old friends, however, I personally, rely on the idea that we have to make new friends. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that, seldom have I seen that a young person has not shown changes in his action since he was a teenager which is the time we usually chose our first friends. These changes in criteria demand to have new friends who we have most common with. To demonstrate my point I want to use one of my personal experiences. In high school, I had one close friend who we were also neighbors. So intimate was our friendship that all the people called us twins. We had drifted apart because of the college and after that, in the time we saw each other we barely have a common interest to talk about.
Furthermore, another reason which has inviolable right to be mentioned is, bad friends may hamper us to be successful. It is without any doubt better to have persons who have numerous merit in our life instead of the one who stands to the ways of our redemption. It is better for any person who makes judicious new friends instead of stick to bad old ones. Choosing a diligent person as a friend not only has an undeniably good effect on ourselves but also helps us to meet other paramount persons.
Taking all the aforementioned reasons and example into account we can deduce that it is always better to find new friends instead of keep our old ones who may not anymore have something in common our perhaps they are not as a good person which we need in our life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y have a common interest to talk about. Furthermore, another reason which has in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54411764706 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48345912069 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1380691644 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12420448617 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048890866174 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406883694243 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871951535542 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213261830895 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.