The person who teaches us something, even a minor matter, has a great rule in our lives and we should act courteously toward them. Making mistakes is an inevitable part of our life and nobody can claim that I did not do any wrong move in my life. A plethora of people might incline toward the notion that in a case which the teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect they should interrupt and correct him, however, I personally, rely on the idea that we should wait until the class or meeting ends then talk to the teacher personally. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at my most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that maybe the lecturer made that mistake intentionally to make some point and with mentioning that we may do the precarious of ruining the teacher's goal.
Usually, the meeting leader or lecturer is a judicious person who is totally aware of what he is doing and the likelihood of doing a misapprehension is quite rare. I can give you an example from my personal life. when I was at work last week, my manager during a lecture about the company income from a new product, intentionally claims that the revenue of that product is less than the other products of our company, to manipulate the employees to work harder.
Furthermore, another reason which has an inviolable right to be mentioned is, it is well-advised to act politely toward others and refuses to embarrass them in public. The person who is the leader in a conference has a paramount situation and it is not out of courtesy to broke that superior feeling. I should mention one other situation that I witnessed at the last conference I attend. In the middle of the lecture, the orator made a minor mistake and one person from the audience mentioned it so caused that the person who was the lecturer lost his self-confidence and could not resume his speech properly.
Taking all the aforementioned reasons, and examples into account, one can deduce that it is more beneficial if we pinpoint some mistake in the middle of some lecture wait until that the lecture finishes and then in a properiate situation mention our idea personally to the speaker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...we may do the precarious of ruining the teachers goal. Usually, the meeting leader or l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...e you an example from my personal life. when I was at work last week, my manager dur...
^^^^
Line 8, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion our idea personally to the speaker.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76455696203 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76872917422 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521518987342 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3672664495 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.769230769 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3846153846 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164401246221 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531351252371 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695888382733 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083329215063 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591113275072 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.