School years are the most important part of someone's life since he or she learns so many things that are both helpful in her or his personal life and career in the future. The delicate job of teaching the most useful concepts is teacher's responsible.
one of the common ways of teaching is assigning a project. I agree with this statement that works on a joint project can be more efficient for three reasons. first, beside the project, children learn how to work on a group. second, they can exchange their knowledge. teachers should review the fewer number of projects so they have more time to spend on each of those projects.
The first reason that I totally support the joint project is the manner of teamwork that the students can learn, besides the own concept of it. Each student has a good chance to cooperate with other members and argue with them. Maybe he or she needs to correct his or her teammate and this teaches them how to be polite and also critical although the others do not agree with his or her opinion.
My other reason for supporting this statement is the way that students learn from each other in teamwork. The best way to teach the students, in my opinion, is indirect teaching. In the time that student wants to embark on a project, the teacher can put the brilliant student on the same team as a weak one. this way the pupil who has more knowledge can help the other ones to learn. This way teache can heat two birds with one stone. both students did a project and teach each other.
and the last reason why I advocate the attitude of this opinion is that when the learners work on a team together on one project, fewer projects the teacher have to review so he can put more time in each of that. The teacher can correct them better and more careful.
From what have discussed above, we can finally draw a conclusion that says, it is more efficient that the teacher assigns a project to a group of students than to each one of them. since it can help them with their teamwork ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...eful concepts is teachers responsible. one of the common ways of teaching is assig...
^^^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...an be more efficient for three reasons. first, beside the project, children learn how...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... children learn how to work on a group. second, they can exchange their knowledge. te...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teachers
...nd, they can exchange their knowledge. teachers should review the fewer number of proje...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...student on the same team as a weak one. this way the pupil who has more knowledge ca...
^^^^
Line 6, column 436, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...ache can heat two birds with one stone. both students did a project and teach each o...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... did a project and teach each other. and the last reason why I advocate the atti...
^^^
Line 10, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...p of students than to each one of them. since it can help them with their teamwork ab...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...p of students than to each one of them. since it can help them with their teamwork ab...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp them with their teamwork ability.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, if, may, second, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47708894879 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23078352039 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474393530997 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7378125776 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.05 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254598468752 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858491156392 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504544270076 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140740480742 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056833815881 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.