The passage and the lecture hold a different opinion on the topic whether the communal online encyclopedias are less valuable than traditional printed encyclopedias. The lecture lists the error existing in encyclopedias, the strategies, the representative ability of users' interest to argue what the passage suggests.
To begin with, the passage claims that the communal online encyclopedias is inaccurate, for anyone can edit them, and some contributors may lack special academic knowledge. However, the lecture points out that every encyclopedia is not perfect. In this case, because the mistakes could be corrected on time, the communal online encyclopedias could even be more accurate in fact.
Furthermore, the passage indicates that the communal online encyclopedias is easy to be tarnish so that it is harmful to users; yet the lecture suggests that we can use special module to step back the harm. For example, let some experts as editors to eliminate the corrupted articles. In other words, we can use strategies to inhibit the corrupting or fabricating activities.
Besides, unlike the traditional encyclopedias, which is edited by a few people at a old era, the communal online encyclopedias can be corrected by usual people at any time. Thus, it is the communal online encyclopedias that can represent most users' interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ias, which is edited by a few people at a old era, the communal online encycloped...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in fact, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 52.1666666667 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 209.0 407.700716846 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44019138756 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15689414335 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583732057416 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6569819414 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.7 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.45110844103 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0145955860587 0.236089414692 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00622611225393 0.076458572812 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00953656656258 0.0737576698707 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00965028088956 0.150856017488 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101392643665 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.