Managing money is a demanding task, not a cup of tea for everyone. It is also like an art, so much so that you invest money which grows or spend it wisely. Integrating such qualities from a young age in children, will enable to become financially responsible adults in future.
For example, parents give their child some money, either on regular intervals or not. Whenever parents give such pocket money to children, they must not forget to take account of money spent of various items. This way the sense of responsibility can be brought in the kids. Even if they have spent it on buying candies, asking them about expenditure will be helpful. However, there is a chance that kid might get annoyed or do not like such methods. For that, slowly tell the kid to maintain a ledger, which can be updated daily at night. This way some sense of accounting can be established.
Another thing which can be done is tightening of financial resources. I mean, we can should not give the amount of fixed money on fixed intervals. Rather, give them amount which is variable after fixed or variable interval. When we do such thing, start by telling kids that they should keep a check on their expenditures because the conditions may change in every installment. In doing so, kids may try to plan out their expenditures or even try to keep something in reserve for unplanned expenses.
Above mentioned two ways can help a great deal in inculcating the financial responsibility from a young age and it should be reflected in future when adults can be financially responsible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o become financially responsible adults in future. For example, parents give their chi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, another thing, for example, i mean
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 272.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77205882353 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6979483266 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6750540735 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.125 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158640355844 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052190948784 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428148286647 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110832097655 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522932510311 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.