People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are indeed poor decision makers. Although, one can argue that decisions, from their very nature vary considerably depending on myriad reasons, contexts and abilities. In that sense one person can make different decisions on same problem in different context and environment.
However, decision making process itself involves a lot of iterative thinking on part of decision maker. Decision can be based on emotions or logic. To make the decision person must think critically and use all the available information so that best decision can be taken. In case it is a emotional decision then the person must evaluate all the emotional outcomes before finalizing the decision. However, once a decision relating to emotions are taken it should not be justified later because logic was not at all used in the process of decision making.
Sometime, during decision making process, there is a trade off between logic and emotion. In those situations person has to either establish a balance between the two or choose any one of those. In any selected scenario justification cannot be provided at a later stage if either of them were not part of evaluation process.
For example, in professional setup during meetings and conferences, some people tend to speak anything which comes in their mind related to strategy irrespective of any factual evidence or data backing. Later on when asked about explanation, they usually use logic and weird data to substantiate their statements. This behavior is not ideal for any human being where a proper evaluation of every context and problem is important before reaching any conclusion.
To conclude, I would mention that first we must understand the decision making process and gather as much information as possible whether it is emotional or logical. Then we must extrapolate cause and effects of all the available data points or outcomes based on emotions. Then only based on available choices decisions should be taken. It is slipshod on part of a person to first take the decision and then justify.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...st decision can be taken. In case it is a emotional decision then the person must...
^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'situations'' or 'situation's'?
Suggestion: situations'; situation's
...off between logic and emotion. In those situations person has to either establish a balanc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18786127168 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75180481692 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3325263247 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7222222222 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501077878699 0.243740707755 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180034052027 0.0831039109588 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202239967569 0.0758088955206 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265257140709 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181270836594 0.0667264976115 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.