There has been much discussion around the issue of importance of the accessability to different sources of information. In my perception, access to information from separete resources provides broad understanding of the particular topic. I will explain my position by supporting my opinion with several examples.
First of all, the informational enviroment is growing really fast, and because of it one resource sometimes isn’t enough for broad understanding of the particular issue. For example, when I was writing my diploma work, there was a requeirement for submitting the work that the student must provide minimum 100 affilations in my paper work. In other word, I needed to read various research articles or sceintific books and to combine all the information from them in the diploma work.
Seconly, correctness of information in journals sometimes are under serious doubt. What I eager to say that if person rely on the only one source of information, he or she will possibly present the situation discribed in the source wrong or will not be able to see the whole picture. In my perception, a lot of people make this mistake, when they read one article in a social media, such as Facebook, and they start to believe in it and present this information as an absolut truth to other people. This is how rumors and gossips are appearing in the the society. Therefore, for avoiding this I suppose that we shoud carefuly and criticaly check the information which goes through the our minds.
To wrap up, I concur that people should use as many sources as they can for obtaining correct and true information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are sometimes
... correctness of information in journals sometimes are under serious doubt. What I eager to sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... people. This is how rumors and gossips are appearing in the the society. Therefore, for avoi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...how rumors and gossips are appearing in the the society. Therefore, for avoiding this I...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...how rumors and gossips are appearing in the the society. Therefore, for avoiding this I...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...heck the information which goes through the our minds. To wrap up, I concur that peo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, so, therefore, for example, i suppose, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 270.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02222222222 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92743514757 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607407407407 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3204418517 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907085549563 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328385548783 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.015860945695 0.0737576698707 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551948275418 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122254014579 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.