tpo 19 Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the lecture are about the buzzing, which is a new tactic of advertising. People who advertise are called buzzers. The reading passage claims that many critics would like to see it stopped. As opposed to, the speaker, who is already a buzzer disagrees with reading's reasons of why buzzing should be banned.
First and foremost, the writer points out that critics complain that customers should know about the person, who is praising the product that is paid to advertise that item. In addition, knowing is very important, because people would expect the truth from people who they believe are trustworthy. On the contrary, the speaker cannot disagree more with this viewpoint, he said that it is true that he get paid from the company, but that does not mean that he lies when promoting the product. Therefore, he thinks the claim is misleading.
The second argument the author gives is that buzzers pretend that they are private individuals, so that consumers listen to their endorsement less critically. As a result, they do not know that are lobbied, and it could harm them. However, the talker states that when people ask them, they have to know how to answer their questions. Consequently, if they do not know how to answer, then they will become suspicious about their product.
Finally, on one hand the reading suggests that buzzing is likely to be harmful to social network. Once people become aware of buzzers, they will not trust individuals in general. Therefore mistrust will be spread everywhere. On the other hand, the speaker, refutes this claim by saying that if the product do not have a good quality, then the company would not recruit buzzers to promote them at all. Therefore, this view is not convincing.
In conclusion, the reading's points are contrasted by the speaker.
- tpo 40 Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- tpo 61 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading 43
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- tpo 66 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... will not trust individuals in general. Therefore mistrust will be spread everywhere. On ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in general, as a result, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52608460305 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3324530435 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.45110844103 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138523879466 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465648511033 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423060405291 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926355719902 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046097534114 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.