Some people think that teachers should share their political and social views with their students. They say by doing that the teachers melt with the kids and students don't feel far from their teachers. Although I understand their point of view, I have a different opinion. I believe that teachers should keep their points of view to themselves rather than share them with the students because this makes bias in the students' minds, and it is just wast of time.
First, usually, the teacher is one of the role models in the students' life. When a teacher shares his/her political, social or religious point of view, the students get affected by this opinion. Sometimes they form their own opinion depending on the teacher's one. For example, last year, before the USA presidential election, when it was clear enough that the competition is between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump. My son's teacher in the school was telling the kids about the election, what it is for, who are the nominated people, and how it is done. I found my little five years son formed his own opinion and telling me about the candidate he wants me to elect. I asked him why he chose this person, not the other one, he told me that this is his teacher's opinion and he wants to hold the same opinion like her. It may not represent a real problem in this topic for this range of age, but it will definitely cause a huge problem if the teacher discusses an issue like transgender with a middle school students, especially if he/she holds an opinion oppose the student's molars or opinion. Simply because students respect their teacher and like their point of view and hold a bias against any other opinion.
Second, students go to school to learn, not to talk about other social or political events and discuss them. The time span of the semester is hardly enough to fit the subjects, no time to waste on other things. Students are really in need of every second. I can remember when I was in high school, we had this chemistry teacher who loves to share his opinions about everything with us, he tells us about his trip to Germany, his opinion in our country economic situation, and many many more topics. He used to spend at least twenty minutes of the lesson time just talking about anything. At the end of the semester, we hardly finished three-quarters of what we should learn. We struggled after that to study the rest by ourselves. He just wasted our valuable time in things that are not valuable.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above. I encourage every teacher to keep his/her opinions away from the students. If they did so, they will discover for themselves, that this is much better for students and their time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eachers melt with the kids and students dont feel far from their teachers. Although ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...eacher is one of the role models in the students life. When a teacher shares his/her pol...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, before the USA presidential election, when it was clear enough that the compet...
^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: many
... in our country economic situation, and many many more topics. He used to spend at least ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, second, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64225941423 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36406949991 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9931364289 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.76 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.12 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17377217237 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057659956794 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624458616307 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126232229122 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873433650623 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.