TPO 22- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom
Teachers should be a good example for students as a motif. Students willingly or unwillingly learn books and life from their teachers. Therefore, teachers directly have an effect on students behavior and manner. People including teachers have a personal view about politics. Even though, talking about politics in class seems interesting, in this author view, teachers should not talk about their own views in class because of three important reasons.
First, it will occupy the time of the class to an out of scope thing. Owing to the amusing details about politics, it may go on unrestricted. In some cases, it transforms to a debate, which sometimes may become a fight. This will waste the time of the class and may reduce the class eficiency. For example, I remember a vivid memory from my highschool. We had a chemistry teacher, who was an adherent to a popular political group. Approximately in all of his classes, he come up with theories about what the supreme leader is doing behind the curtains. Students enjoyed to listen to his stories, because he described it briliant. At the end of the semester, the teacher found out that half of the book is remained and he did not taught it. Therefore, he asked us to visit extra classes after the semester and before the finals, which was kind of silly and exhausting for us. This example shows that teachers should not devote their class time to another subject especially politics.
Second, because of some particular views, students will hate their teacher. The consequences is that the student does not want to learn anything from the hatred teacher. Therefore, he will not learn the subject in that class. For instance, the same chemistry teacher in my highschool was hated by preponderance of the students. Even though his stories was interesting, it was radical and not accepted by other point of views. In conclusion, that course is one of my worst classes in my academic life, since I hated the teacher and did not learn the subject in addition to extra classes we had to go. That was a mandatory burden to carry.
Finally, besides the relation between teacher and student, it deteriorated friendly relationships. Generally, teenage students do not care about politics. However, if some person ignite the contention, they will exceed the limits. The teeanges will transform from a serene kid to a seething and integral adult. For example, number of my relationships with my friends became deteriorated during the semester which included chemistry. Although, after the semester, my relation with some of them became good, on the other hand I have a bloody relation with some of them since then. It depicts the indirect effect of teacher speaking politics in a classroom on relationships between students.
In conclusion, teacher behavior and virtue will effect the students manner directly and indirectly. Thus, the teachers have to be careful about what they speak in the class. I suggest that teachers should utilize the time they have in classroom and use it efficiently, which results on delightness of students too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-03 | mehrnazsadr | 76 | view |
- essay TPO-23 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 73
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 22- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- TPO 9 -Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOEFL TPO 13 - Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...re, teachers directly have an effect on students behavior and manner. People including t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'enjoyed listening'.
Suggestion: enjoyed listening
... is doing behind the curtains. Students enjoyed to listen to his stories, because he described it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'teach'
Suggestion: teach
... of the book is remained and he did not taught it. Therefore, he asked us to visit ext...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ll hate their teacher. The consequences is that the student does not want to learn...
^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...usion, teacher behavior and virtue will effect the students manner directly and indire...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...her behavior and virtue will effect the students manner directly and indirectly. Thus, t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, talking about, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02923976608 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72987873642 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477582846004 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9527028395 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1818181818 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217693229605 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061501039731 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649229397097 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148202523647 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787506676257 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.