TPO 30-It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether employees should have a long hours job in three days instead of long hours job in five workdays has receieved a great deal of attention from wrokers and companies. Although some may argue that by having a three long hours work, people would be able to have more entertainment time during their rest of the week, I as well as many others believe that five workday with shourt hours would be more benefecial for the workers, and the following explanations will furthure elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, a paramount reason why five work day with shorter hours is better for employees is that working for a long time could decrease the efficiency of the people. This means that the capability of the people to doing their work is limited so after a amount of time they would be tired; therefore, they would not be able to concentrate on their job. It is sometimes said that the appropriate amount of time for working are eight hours each day. Hence, the experts state that after spending more than this time on a specific job could augment to make mistakes.
A further reason for this view is that for the people who have three days worday in a week returning to the work on the next week would be ardouos due to the reason that they were far away from their work space and after a couple of enjoyable days it would be difficult for them to concentrate on their starting workday. For instance, employees who work only three days a week and spend rest of their time on doing another project or entertaining, on their office their mind would be involve in the other projects so, the might not be able to be as adept as they can.
Finally, it is occasionally said that having a routine life is more proper for most of the people due to the fact that they could have a routine schedule in their life. Take five wrokday employees as an example, if they decide to participate in a sport class, they would have free time on their evening since most of the sports club have a routine time for their attenders. As a result, three workday employees would not be able to attend the sports club since they would miss three days of the club schedule and they should work long hours on their work on these days.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, I can draw the conclusion that having a five daywork bur shorter hours is more beneficial for the people chiefly due to the reason that this desicion not only improve their lifestyle but also could help them to focus on their job better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to doing their work is limited so after a amount of time they would be tired; the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in brief, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55075593952 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37866900421 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429805615551 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9413341241 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.583333333 100.406767564 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.5833333333 20.6045352989 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37010622214 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173774034885 0.076458572812 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768514872302 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242717960406 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666456538082 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 11.7677419355 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.