TPO-33
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A Teacher is someone who can shape the character, caliber, and future of an individual. A good teacher can ignite the imagination, inspire hope, and instill a love for learning. Most of the teachers assign projects to their students in groups or individually. As far as I'm concerned, group works can ameliorate student's abilities in a couple of ways, which I will elaborate upon hereunder.
To begin with, group projects in a class-room can deepen student's friendships, team spirit, and problem-solving skills. These critical skills are essential for a student to be an upright citizen when they serve society through their employment. My school experience is a compelling example of this specific situation. During my school time, our teachers insisted us to actively participate in group projects and assignments. We co-ordinated group meetings and discussions regarding the topic and these meetings deeprooted our friendships. Moreover, this inculcates a positive team spirit in us and motivated us to collect diverse ideas and solutions for the project which not only improves our knowledge but also our coordination and problem-solving skills. As a computer engineer, the experience to work in groups made me a team leader and promotes my position as a senior manager of the firm.
Next, teaming for projects can foster children's public speaking skills which are not possible through if we work alone. In groups, each individual has a voice to speak up and open their mind to contribute to the project. Furthermore, This will alleviate shyness and also fear to speak in front of the audience. I remember, my classmate was always never trying to speak in front of other colleagues due to his fear of speak up. However, our class teacher indulges in his behavior and made him as a group leader. Thus, he became an active member of the group and this improved his speaking skills. Now, he is a motivational speaker. Had he never get these experiences in his school, he could not achieve this profession.
Finally, working solely for a project has its own advantages. convenience, fewer chances for arguments, no need of spending time in discussions, and the ability to utilize their private space are some of the benefits. On the other hand, I believe that working as a group outweigh advantages than working alone.
All in all, by taking all points into account, I vehemently assure that teaming as groups is a better way to learn rather than working alone. Not only can teach particular skills but also it can reduce fear and shyness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ts in groups or individually. As far as Im concerned, group works can ameliorate s...
^^
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ination and problem-solving skills. As a computer engineer, the experience to wor...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Convenience
...y for a project has its own advantages. convenience, fewer chances for arguments, no need o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lity to utilize their private space are some of the benefits. On the other hand, I believe ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05463182898 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90989286518 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55106888361 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8151116461 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181437083937 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541468074818 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546061708012 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1043956063 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426562100443 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.