It is clearly understood that in such a sophisticated world, the spread of technology is undeniable and in these circumstances, the number of cars in the future could be in fluctuation. Some people believe in twenty years there will be fewer cars, whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. As far as I am concerned, in the future the number of cars will not be reduced on the other hand will increase. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that with the development of technology everything changes in a good way. For example, the cars will be changed, and cars running on natural energy are on the rise, so the number of them will be increased, and the air pollution will be reduced. This kind of car does not harm the environment and is going to be very useful for the future of the Earth. Also with the development of the population in recent years is pretty obvious for everyone that the need for cars will be increased, so the government in every country should arrange some planning for the future of the technology and protection of the planet.
َAnother reason which should be taken into the consideration is that in the last few years the car production rate increased, while the rate of obsolete cars is lower, so is not possible that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. On the other hand with the development of the population and the increase in demand, it is necessary to find a safe way for this increase. Global warming is a very important issue for Earth that everyone should attention to this undeniable fact.
To put it briefly, if one weighs the merits and demerits of the aforementioned statement, one soon realizes that the development of technology is an important issue, and it could be very useful for everyone, and for society, so we should be proper for this event, and use them for having a better future. In fact, there is a myriad of other reasons, supporting the above statement, which could be mentioned but are not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ery useful for the future of the Earth. Also with the development of the population ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to everyone'.
Suggestion: obvious to everyone
...he population in recent years is pretty obvious for everyone that the need for cars will be increase...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...echnology and protection of the planet. َAnother reason which should be taken in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, so, whereas, while, for example, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66577540107 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73182617677 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446524064171 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5852814269 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.230769231 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7692307692 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241113458154 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933178948338 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068704938855 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161660101646 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341922751577 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.