I disagree with the statement exploring the topic that there will be fewer cars in use, 20 years down the line as compared to now. There is a wide variety of cars to choose from nowdays, with the differentiation starting as early as how the car's engine is configured, ie electric or oil going upto, but not limited till what colour the interiors will be; There is a plethora of options when it comes to buying cars and consumers explore all of these willingly. In a lot of countries, cars are often treated as a status symbol- the more the number of cars a family/person can afford to have, the wealthier they are, which while it may not always hold value, it subconsicously holds some truth, and guides a lot of consumers into buying more cars.
As the world population rises, more cars will be in use compared to now. Every family with two earning members at least utilise two cars at least to travel back and forth and this usage will only continue to rise as the population booms. Even with the population growth being curbed, as the economy boosts and more jobs are provided for individuals, they will use more transportation to head to said job, increasing the use of cars. Not only this but also as percentage of population using public transportation rises, it often leads to a high wait time resulting in dissatisfaction among someone who is too tired to wait after a day's worth of hardwork. They would much rather opt for a transportation that allows them to reach their destination quicker (supported by a development of wider and better roads and highways tackling the traffic problem in most metro cities)
Tesla is one of the most popular makers of electric cars and now more and more Teslas are sought after by the Millennial and "GenZ" generation who want to opt for a greener, environment friendlier alternative. The increase in demand of such cars that limit pollution, something most advertised as a proponent of why public transportation such as buses and trains (often powered by non-renewable sources) should be used, will definitely lead to an increase in the number of cars in use as compared to now. Mercedes Benz, a popular luxury car company, came out with an advertisement that showcased the power of the head lamps in their cars by placing them against a cow and displaying its entire anatomy as if it was placed against an x-ray box. Such bold and innovative advertisements will excite consumers and encourage them to buy more of their cars thereby resulting in a rise in numbers of the cars on road.
Thus, I would like to say that a lot more cars will be in use twenty years later than they are today. As family's diverge into a more nuclear setting, their usage of cars to do something as basic as run errands will increase and therefore they will be motivated to buy more cars and use them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75371130739 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.3649989247 48.9658058833 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.846153846 100.406767564 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.5384615385 20.6045352989 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247419484507 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11890920406 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916186069799 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172379393412 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511914263718 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 11.7677419355 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.1575268817 166% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.