TPO 41. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
One of the most important groups of societies is teachers because they prepare the next generations. These hard work and diligent group usually are appreciated with communities. Now there is a controversy about whether they are more appreciated today or not. In my way of thinking nowadays teachers do not have such dignity in the societies rather than past because not only people are busier today, but also behaviors have been changed.
The first reason which should be stated here is that today people are busy. By progressing science and technology, the behavior and the way of living have been changed. People should work hard to provide their need. They may be obligated to work more than one shift a day in different job positions. It prevents them to pay attention to the values of the living, follow that they will forget to be thankful for diligent workers of the society like teachers, firefighters, police officers, and so on. However, in the past, the life was simpler and was not involved with complicated jobs, so they have free times to think about the heroes around them who have sacrificed their life for the future.
The other point which deserves some words here is that through the time people behavior is changed. Human is changing constantly. In the past, there were various beliefs and thinking which are not important for people anymore. For example, in the past, the cities were not such crowded and most of the people knew each other, it makes them help their neighbors in difficulties. However, nowadays cities are crowded, and people migrate to different towns for finding a job of a better place to live, so they do not contact their neighbors and do not know them. Therefore, they do not care about neighbors and just live alone. This makes a big change in their life and behavior. One of these changes includes not appreciating the teachers.
To summarize, today teachers do not have the state and dignity which they had in the past. That is because of changing the values of the society, and the busy life which takes a lot of energy from people that do not allow them to think about the people around them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Maryam Madson | 61 | view |
- TPO 43 . Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class o 60
- TPO 28 75
- TPO 41. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 60
- TPO 28 78
- TPO 49. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding heroes'?
Suggestion: the surrounding heroes
... so they have free times to think about the heroes around them who have sacrificed their life for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...e that do not allow them to think about the people around them.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78494623656 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43531770897 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478494623656 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.99798073 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210128450071 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637823870033 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048522859459 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138581954369 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396385593825 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.