After graduation all people want is to find a job and start to word as soon as possible. However, some people begin question if it is better a position where the emplyee do the same task every day or work in different type of tasks during the day. In my point of view, I think it is better do a wide variety of activities all day long becouse it lead workes to be more efficient. Furthermore it stimulates then to not be carless.
First of all, I have been reading some studies about job efficiency and several of them explained that our ability to focus in one activity decreases over time. It was concluded that by doing only one task during the day the efficiency of work was compromised due the lack of focus. As consequence, many mistakes were commited. For example, once i had a job in a publicity company. My job consisted in review all the articles before they were publicated online on the internet. At the begining I was excited, It was my first job. However, after a while I started to feel bored, my focus goes down and I begin to do a lot of mistakes in my reviews. At the time, talking to my boss, he sugested me to assimilate more task on the office, and it worked.
Second, If the job start to be boring, the job activity became unpleasant. For instance, a person who work in same task for a long time begin to question 'why I'm here working with it?' the resoult is a employee careless about the job that can do mistakes or even cause acidents. For example, my father told me that his coworker lost a hand becouse by doing the same activity everey day become carreless and forget some principles about safety.
As last, when you only have one task, you can miss important things of work’s environment, like know new people or even thing creatively. Making exactly the same thing unable workers know new people, create solutions or even act proactively, since unforeseen event barely occurs. I remember a day that a new colleague was having issues to administer her tasks and I suggested a solution that changed not only the way she was working, but also gave me the opportunity to know her more, what would not happen if we had only one single task to do.
To sum up, becouse of the gain in eficiency and due the careless behavior developed in those who do the same task all thay long, I prefer to work in dinamic company where my routine of work could be full of different tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...y of activities all day long becouse it lead workes to be more efficient. Furthermor...
^^^^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...se it lead workes to be more efficient. Furthermore it stimulates then to not be carless. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...stakes were commited. For example, once i had a job in a publicity company. My jo...
^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...k for a long time begin to question why Im here working with it? the resoult is a ...
^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...o question why Im here working with it? the resoult is a employee careless about th...
^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...Im here working with it? the resoult is a employee careless about the job that ca...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, while, for example, for instance, i think, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44469525959 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50374320403 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52144469526 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8762919314 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.45 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.15 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23883964049 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677573405038 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632556497548 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138412857323 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435421131174 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.