TPO 42: Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Work satisfaction plays a dominant role in having a feeling of happiness and pleasure in life. Several factors determine work satisfaction including the work environment, the proportionality between the work and the educations, and the type of work. It seems that the last factor has more contribution to work satisfaction rather than other factors. In this regard, some people hold the view that workers are more satisfied when they do different tasks during the workday than do a similar task all day long. I strongly agree with this viewpoint and in the following paragraphs, I will substantiate this view thorough three convincing reasons.
The most prominent point to be mentioned is that according to numerous psychological studies, the repetition of a single task is tedious for the human mind. When workers successively repeat a single task, gradually, they will be exhausted and lose their concentration. Consequently, they can not accomplish the task efficiently and if these conditions continue they will lose your self-confidence in their workplace. In fact, repetition depletes workers' energy and enthusiasm and in the long run, may lead to severe psychological disorders like depression and due to their poor performance they may lose their job position. Hence, workers would be more satisfied to do different tasks.
Secondly, doing different task provides an opportunity for workers to enhance their skills and abilities in different domains and confront new challenges. However, different individuals have his/her own characteristics and aspiration and while some people prefer to follow a monotonous rhythm in their life and avoid taking risks and challenges other people believe it is crucial to get out of their comfort zone and experience new things as it is the only way to become experienced and learn new skills. For instance, workers who do different tasks during their workday can easily set a daily plan for themselves, categorize their tasks into various categories like urgent tasks, important but not urgent, and etc and allocate a specific time to accomplish each task. In the long run, these workers would have a higher level of skill in time management and can implement it in different aspects of their life.
Finally, accomplishing different tasks helps workers to feel better about themselves. workers who do various tasks gradually become adept in each of them and this has a direct impact on their self-confidence, consequently, they become more passionate about their job and try to improve their performance which also has positive consequences for the company they work for. These kind of workers are an asset for their company and their employer count on them and gives more responsibility to them as they are versatile and can handle their tasks properly. Hence, they deeply feel more satisfied not only about their job but also about themselves.
In conclusion, doing different tasks help workers to get out of the trap of routine works and boredom. They can enhance the domain of their knowledge and fortify their self-confidence in this way which eventually leads to their satisfaction about their job and their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Workers
...orkers to feel better about themselves. workers who do various tasks gradually become a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...equences for the company they work for. These kind of workers are an asset for their compa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2666.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26877470356 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96808206802 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482213438735 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6830955745 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.3 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30751717727 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118239194904 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118932158193 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186150033852 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547367299635 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.