Mistakes from elders hurt sometimes, especially from our supervisors whose responsibility to teach us the correct information. Yet, at the same breath of the mistake, nobody has the right to interrupt the lecture and correct the mistake, because dignity is important in the concept of respect. From my humble perspective who a student attends lectures regularly, the audience must wait until the meeting or class is over and people are gone, and then they may talk to the teacher, whereas saying noting is not the correct way, too. Following reasons give my perspective about the subject.
To begin with, the first and important reason is for not to interrupt the flow of the lecture. Sometimes, lecturers do minor mistakes which are irrelevant with the main idea of the topic. When this situation happens, if the mistake does not affect the meaning, students can easily tolerate. Moreover, professors may be distracted if someone interrupts for correcting. Thus, even other students may be affected, since the professor might not manage to expression and the link between further details and the previous ones. For example, one of our classmate two years ago in the evolution classes, although the professor equipped with advanced knowledge, stoped the lecture and stick in a point in the description explained by the teacher, and the rest of the class they discussed the mistake.
Subsequently, the other and related reason is unintentional errors that have been done by lecturers and meeting leaders. Not common but happens from time to time, people may give incorrect information on critical details. However, nobody can blame others to do errors because they might do it unintentionally. At this point, it is right to wait until the end of the session, and then they mention after everybody leaves the class in order for not to shame in front of others. Additionally, respect as a human being, it won't be wise to blame them, instead of doing it appropriately.
In conclusion, I hold the opinion to wait until the end of the session, and the in proper time the mistake may be corrected respectfully. Essentially, people should consider not interrupting the lectures, and tolerate irrelevant and minor mistakes. Lastly, people may do unintentional mistakes, so it won't be right to correct without knowing if it is intentionally or not.
- T P O-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is speci 76
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 14- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'hurt'.
Suggestion: sometimes hurt
Mistakes from elders hurt sometimes, especially from our supervisors whose ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11458333333 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8837427455 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5447487127 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143184407463 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444257900872 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259239339441 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889872195417 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223783945015 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.