Some people may say that disturbing teacher or the meeting leader when they are speaking is not a polite action. Personally, I prefer interrupting and correcting the mistake gentlely as long as something go wrong in a classroom or a meeting. I feel this way for several reasons and will explore them in the following paragraphs.
On one hand, all the hardwork depending on the given information may be useless. Both time and resources are limited in this fast-paced world. People nowadays do not have a lot of spaces to make mistakes. Therefore, if we spend time on anything that must go wrong, we will be so dissappointed and frustrated. Moreover, we may have no chance to try the same thing again after the dramatic failure.
On the other hand, pointing out the wrong part of a lecture or a talking means that I have strongly focused on all content of every critical task. When no one can notice a mistake that I have found, the teacher or the boss would have a positive impression of me. Because I am the one who always dedicate myself into the vital tasks and rigiously avoid all encountered mistakes, I will prevent as much potential risks as I can. If I am a boss, I will appreciate professional workers like me.
One more point to mention is that other classmates or workers will think I am a reliable partner to cooperate together. No one is willing to coordinate with a silent person who never propose any opinion. In contrast, those who have ability to discover details and avert projects from problems are always beloved and welcomed. Let alone that it is a fabulous way to show the responsibility and leadership of myself.
To sum up, it is necessary for me to make sure that all content in a class or meeting to be correct and clear. This will not only make the real progress but also avoid further mistakes. In this way, no time will be wasted and all repeated or tedious things due to the wrong information given in a classroom or a meeting can be removed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, i feel, in contrast, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58873239437 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69379738222 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546478873239 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6547072494 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7368421053 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111781765031 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03398880605 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493823116045 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722276931676 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748187649375 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.