TPO 46
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
a Question that we might ask ourselves in the age of stardom is "are the opinions of celebrities more important to younger people than older people"? One can argue that that this statement holds absolutely true in the age of social media. In order to get our head around this issue, we need to analyze it from three different angles: the Social spectrum, the Economic spectrum and the Political spectrum.
First and foremost, most well-known celebrities have a massive following on a wide variety of social media accounts, by taking online analytics into account, younger people make up a significant percentage of their followers. The typical content of these accounts are opinion pieces and personal information and it can be inferred that this sort of information is quite relevant in the eyes of most youngsters which make up the bulk of the online audience.
Second, celebrities can be seen as symbols of wealth and power. They can be idols to those who strive to follow in their footsteps. Often times we can see young fans swarming movie premieres and award show red-carpets just to meet their celebrity idols or see them from afar. in Addition, celebrities that have the star-power to bring people to theatres and shows can determine whether a product is a success or failure. Thereby they leverage a significant economic advantage. Older people in retrospect, show much less enthusiasm towards these products and they are at a point in their life where they don't see a need to idolize one person.
Third, celebrities can be often seen making political statements. This can be seen as tool to create controversy and it results in people of certain beliefs flocking to their direction. Celebrities have the reach and presence to make their opinions known and widespread and as many of their followers are youngsters, they can establish rapport with them by adhering to what is generally preferred by their main audience. This rapport will result in greater fanaticism by their fans and increases the extent to which their opinions are deemed important by their fan-base.
Now that we have analyzed and understood the three main ways celebrities can affect younger people and how those ways are irrelevant to older people, we can surmise that opinions of celebrities are logically more important to younger people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
a Question that we might ask ourselves in...
^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... than older people'? One can argue that that this statement holds absolutely true in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... celebrity idols or see them from afar. in Addition, celebrities that have the sta...
^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Older) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...a significant economic advantage. Older people in retrospect, show much less enthusias...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...are at a point in their life where they dont see a need to idolize one person. Th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, thus, well, as to, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08571428571 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74086409289 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511688311688 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7335324508 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137737359616 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495762028851 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527151791573 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891730521294 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039095626304 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.