The magnitude influence of our friends is vividly obvious for our happiness and no one can cast a shadow on the fact that our friendships can define terrific features about our personality. The paramount role of this perplexing relationship among human beings arises vast varieties of controversial question marks do not only about its significant function in an individual's life but also about the quality and quantity of our friends. Some people advocate the fact that making more friends would nourish our communication abilities and it is a vigorous way to get knowledgeable about human essence. Admittedly, I can not acknowledge their statement since I literally believe that we are more delightful if we maintain our friends for a long-life. The ensuing paragraphs the most prominent reasons for my idea will be elaborate.
First and for the most is that we will ameliorate the quality of our friendship if we take our time for recognizing each other's positive and negative aspects and try to amend our relationship's defects by the time. I truly believe we can not sacrifice our intimacy potential for the plethora of people unless we seek for many superficial attachments with no sense of profound closeness. The psychologists state that the main reason of feeling exhilaration upon our relationships is that human's desires and instincts dictate him/her to get known by another peer as a survival demand. Consequently, their happiness will evolve as deep as they get understood by others.
Another compelling reason which needs to be considered is that it is not far-fetched the maintained friends are more reliable trustworthy. As the matter of the fact, if you have kept them for a long time, it means that they pass all the vicissitudes and they get evaluated by your intrinsically cynical mind. For no doubt, we all need to rely on someone, who takes our back trough difficulties. Practically, as much as the time goes, the friends are more intimated and they dedicate themselves to their friendship which elicits more honesty. For the illustration, as much as the friendship passes we feel more burden on our shoulders to be faithful, supportive, and thoughtful which means the acceleration of confidence among us. Hence, I strongly uphold of having fewer friends but keeping the most trustworthy ones.
All aforementioned arguments lead us to conclusion that the abundance of friendships won't satisfy the demand of being acknowledged profoundly by your peers as logically we can't settle sufficient time for this knowing each other. Moreover, it is vivid that reliance spirit and the commitment state between friend will be grown if their friendship gets maintained by the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ly about its significant function in an individuals life but also about the quality and qua...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rofoundly by your peers as logically we cant settle sufficient time for this knowing...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18721461187 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03848256631 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.6338147933 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.647058824 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7647058824 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178510720396 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630181259765 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410187236998 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1117756223 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161866128768 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.