TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In the modern era, governmental decisions are regarded as crucial factors contributing to the various aspects of people's lives. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the areas that the government should spend its money. Many people adhere to the view that, the budget should be spent on art, while others believe it will be more influential if it is spent on sports. Ego, when it comes to my stance, by weighing up the pros and cons, I firmly hold that investing on sports is a more beneficial choice. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that supporting athletics would encourage people in exercising and improves public health. The proliferation of the investments the sport industry made people to step into the path of being professional players. Although some of them will not achieve this goal, the roots of practicing and exercising will be prominent in the society. My own experience is a compelling example of this. About ten years ago, a fashion in my country was started to attract young and talented children for the academics of our local football clubs. As a result, scores of students, including me and my friends, started practicing football to become a famous athlete in the future. We did not accomplished to be professionals, however, we already play football every weekend together and this habit helped us to stay fit.

Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that it can turn sports into a successful industry and attract investors from all over the world to our country. Watching sports has been one of the major entertainments of people for decades. Consequently, it has absorbed the attention of giant companies to spend their dollars voraciously in this industry. Take the premier league of England as an example. We can see clash of the different incorporations over taking the sponsorships of the famous teams. Also, the national television benefits from selling the rights of broadcasting the exhibitions to other countries. thus, I it helps a lot in the development of the country.

In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that investing in athletics is more beneficial than spending the budget on arts. This is because it increases the healthy behaviors among society, and draws the attention of investors to the country.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'accomplish'
Suggestion: accomplish
...amous athlete in the future. We did not accomplished to be professionals, however, we alread...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ing the exhibitions to other countries. thus, I it helps a lot in the development of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...ibitions to other countries. thus, I it helps a lot in the development of the country...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, thus, while, in brief, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07462686567 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94117807218 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574626865672 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8891219662 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1428571429 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963963772324 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0253168132018 0.076458572812 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374294974615 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568903731533 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281987698016 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.