TPO OG2 independent agree or not young people enjoy life more than older people do

Essay topics:

TPO OG2- independent
agree or not? young people enjoy life more than older people do.

Modern humans have to always do their best to develop themselves in a variety of things which can be hard for some of them as they may not enjoy their lives. In this context, there are mutually exclusive ideas regarding whether young generation enjoy their lives more or elderly ones do. From my point of view, I am inclined to the latter notion in spite of the fact that the former has more aficionados among people. My answer to this debating bone of contention is twofold. In the following, the rationale behind it will be elaborated by the most outstanding, solid proofs.

The first and foremost reason which is worth mentioning is that old people have experienced almost everything in their lives. They have had many ups and downs, so they mostly do not regret anything. Moreover, they passed the hard times of working for long hours and undergoing various stresses of finding a suitable, lovely mate or having a happy family and kids. This will positively affect the satisfaction level of their lives. As an illustration, my uncle, Farhad, had lived in USA for 20 years before he came back to his motherland, Iran. He earned money as much as he could; he experienced working in gas stations for night shifts, albeit enthusiastically. He met his wife in the United States and became the breadwinner of the family. In a nutshell, he did whatever he could to develop his life. Nowadays, he is not worried at all, just sitting in a corner and supervising his two boys helping them to become successful in their lives by sharing his experiences.

The second and equally far-reaching explanation to bear in mind is that old people generally have more money than youngsters insomuch as they have worked relatively more than the second group. As money is a critical element of being happy, this generation benefits more from this asset. To put it into a more vivid picture, researchers of the department of tourism management in RMIT university, a renowned knowledge institute in Australia, have conducted a survey of Turkey's tourists. They realized that most of the visitors of this country have an average age of 65. This proves that these people have enough money visiting other countries. In other words, the older a person is, the more money they have for spending on hobbies, such as becoming a tourist. Moreover, those scholars have predicted that the rate of these visitors will have increased by the end of 2050, mainly because more people will have retired.

In conclusion, taking all the aforementioned rationalizations into account, I am prone to this belief that old people enjoy their lives more in comparison with younger ones although there are some exceptions which can be excluded from the general rule. To recapitulate my opinions, these people not only have worked as hard as they could and now are just relaxing but also they generally have more money which they can spend for diverse hobbies, like travelling around the world.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, in other words, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2454.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88844621514 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69897016092 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2581898172 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.695652174 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8260869565 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16105230879 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456205534109 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486267240323 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102127527354 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395149099479 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, in other words, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2454.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88844621514 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69897016092 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537848605578 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2581898172 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.695652174 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8260869565 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16105230879 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456205534109 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486267240323 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102127527354 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395149099479 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.