TPO19-In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.(not mine)
In recent years, the issue whether or not people must use different news sources to be accurately informed about events has received a great deal of attention from journalists and news agency managers. Although some may say that due to presence of international news agencies like BBC or CNN, people does not need to use different resources to be well-informed; I as the same as many others, believe that due to varied effective parameters on reported news, people should get information from different sources to be informed properly.
First of all, an important reason why it is better to use varied range of news sources is that news agencies’ political attitude toward different issues may have effect on the reports. Many experts say that news agencies have to work in the same political path of their founders. For example, in news coverage of a negotiation, the news resources of different sides of that negotiation may report different news or try to interpret details in a way that shows their side has win the negotiation. Thus people have to fallow the news of the both sides to have a better understanding of the event.
Another reason for this point of view is that different news topics do not have the same importance for news resources. Although big news agencies claim that they cover different news in the same way, many people mention that different news resources sort news in varied importance. For instance, some new agencies may pay more attention to political news, or some may consider the economic news more important than others. On the other hand, some agencies are just working in a special field like sport news corporations. So if a person wants to be well-informed about different issues, he or she have to get information from varied resources.
Finally, it is occasionally said that people have to use different news channels because it helps them to know the detail better. Most of the journalist mention that news agencies may not have time, specialty or manpower for paying equal attention to different aspects of an event. For example, in a war or a catastrophic events like earth quick, news resources could not have reporters in all of the places which that event has happened, subsequently, each report from that event may have information that other reports does not covered. Thus, people who are using different news resources knows the details better.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that it is better to get information from many different news resources chiefly due to political reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In recent years, the issue whether or not people must use different news sources ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'won'.
Suggestion: won
...ails in a way that shows their side has win the negotiation. Thus people have to fa...
^^^
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ormed about different issues, he or she have to get information from varied resource...
^^^^
Line 7, column 391, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...s resources could not have reporters in all of the places which that event has happened, s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'cover'
Suggestion: cover
...information that other reports does not covered. Thus, people who are using different n...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...at it is better to get information from many different news resources chiefly due to political...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03926096998 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79433511843 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448036951501 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9968926825 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.375 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0625 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353724335109 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143330563667 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104850102441 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242317498973 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959679468727 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.