TPO23(independent)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
In the fast pace world we live today it is often believed that it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure everything is correct. I disagree with that statement for two reasons. I will explain the two reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first reason is that doing things slowly and taking the time to ensure that mistakes are not made will take less time in the long run. this is because when you take your time and make sure everything is done without making mistakes then you do not have to go back and correct the mistakes. if things are done quickly with many mistakes then often time you have to go back and correct the mistakes. Oftentimes this process takes up more time because going back consist of remembering what you did the last time, and trying to solve the mistake mixes in with trying to figure out what you did in the first place. By taking the time to doing things with minimal mistakes you ensure that everything is correct the first time.
For example if I would hire someone to remodeled my kitchen I would rather have that person take their time and make my kitchen the way that I want it. I would not mind if that person took longer than expected as long as the results were good and perfect. I would not like it if the person took less time and make mistakes. even the small mistakes like forgetting to paint a corner or not having the table the right size would take away from the overall appearance of the kitchen. I believe that details are important and I want to get my moneys worth.
In conclusion I disagree with working quickly even if mistakes are made rather than working slowly and making sure that everything is correct. I said this because sometimes going back to fix the mistakes takes longer than if the time would have been taken to do it right the first time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e will take less time in the long run. this is because when you take your time and ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e to go back and correct the mistakes. if things are done quickly with many mista...
^^
Line 5, column 731, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t everything is correct the first time. For example if I would hire someone to r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...rson took less time and make mistakes. even the small mistakes like forgetting to p...
^^^^
Line 9, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant and I want to get my moneys worth. In conclusion I disagree with working qu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 236, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
... mistakes takes longer than if the time would have been taken to do it right the first time. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.472303207 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14967480141 2.67179642975 80% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416909620991 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9281564572 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.266666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367774648392 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145392053908 0.076458572812 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161727860163 0.0737576698707 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287024817283 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174860598708 0.0645574589148 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.15 8.01818996416 77% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 86.8835125448 36% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.