TPO4- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Nowadays, there is a clear comprehension of the causes of global warming and pollution. Currently, many companies that produce cars have been developing alternative ways to decrease the polLution and global warming. Personally, I believe that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today, and I think that new forms of transports will be develop and this is due to the cost to have a personal car that will eventually increase a lot.
To begin with, news forms of transports have been developed, such as the drone transportation. Moreover, the population is in a constant discovering new ways of transport that is more ecofriendly. For example, in the 30's century it was normal to take a trolley-car on a daily basis, however the population incorporated more technology in their lives, now it is common to take an uber, subway and even rent an online-bike. For this reason, I think that in twenty years will have other forms of transport, so the number of cars will decrease.
Secondly, the population of the world in 2040 will have more than 10 billions of people. In addition, there are many scientific studies that prove the relation between the increase of the population with the price growth of many commodities. Whence, the price of the car will be increase and the people will turn to other forms of transport
In conclusion, I strongly believe that in 2040 cars will not be the common way of transport. For the reason, that it will be so costly to maintain this such of thing. Also, I predict that people will find ways to get around for a cheaper and more convenient transit ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 billion'.
Suggestion: 10 billion
...f the world in 2040 will have more than 10 billions of people. In addition, there are many sci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le will turn to other forms of transport In conclusion, I strongly believe that i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 282.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76595744681 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77226957521 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482269503546 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6059113609 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.45110844103 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24143865924 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860677415275 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100104146648 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158380024933 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653940919859 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.