Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
In today's progressive world, no one can turn a blin eye to the significant effects of forms to get information. Some people argues that the best way to be informed are from different news resources. On the extreme of the rope, others point out the opposite opinion. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I firmly believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will explain the reasons to justify my points of view.
As the first and paramount reason, a person who get information from alternatives news will be exposure to different ideas and concepts of determined topic. In other words, get information from distinct sources of news can develop people's knowledge and help them to expend their horizons. As a result, people can discover alternatives ways of thought to understand a problem. Take my experience as a example. When I was at high school, I did a lot of research about the global warming around the world for my science class. So, I started to read about this topic and I discovered different ideas about the causes of global warming. After six months, getting informations about it, I could understand this complex problem which affect the world. Hence, after get information from different sources, I showed my work for my professors and they loved my research. If I had not got informations from different books and articles, nor I could understand this complex problem neither my professors love my final work.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my viewpoint is that, getting a range sources of informations provides for a person valuable experience and can develop skills to help them to achieve their personal goals. To be more specific, the more people have information, the more people can be creative and have a improvement to get their objetives. For instance, an experimental research conducted by some master's scientists shows that a person who always get information from distinct books and texts is more creative to achieve their personal goals. Consequently, get a report from many forms of news will provide for people a good way to improve their knowledge.
In conclusion, take the above reasons into account, I strongly posit that not only get information from many books, texts and article open up a whole gamut of alternatives ideas and concepts, but it also help people to achieve their objectives providing for them valuable experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rstand a problem. Take my experience as a example. When I was at high school, I d...
^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he more people can be creative and have a improvement to get their objetives. For...
^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...natives ideas and concepts, but it also help people to achieve their objectives prov...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04914004914 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83962950132 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518427518428 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4003300515 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.157894737 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252886194853 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864967081563 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756552903019 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159679962713 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368109096809 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.