In twenty years there will be fewer car in use than they are today.
Transportation is a necessary evil in life of the modern people. Among many land transportation, a vast number of people in the world wish to have comfortable personal means of travel. While many people like a private sphere through travelling in a regular basis, in my opinion, the use of the car will be more than they are now as people like to travel more comfortably in the busy schedule and old model of the car will be purchasable to mediocre people.
Impending business in life of people along with their desire to have comfort in travel, makes a people after twenty years, to use more cars than now. We can acknowledge that the task of human being more painstaking and nettlesome; the business and tiredness of the event after twenty years of life can predict easily how laborious it will be. As people will not want to mesh their career at that time, their car use will be evident as they will not want to lose their energy to catch a train or public transportation. For the sake of the activeness and enthusiasm in the work, they will use car as a personal catalyst to make the work efficient. For instance, government work is very tiring and energy demanding; people wish to have a car even who do not have now. Then, the use of the car will be surely increasing in upcoming year as similar cumbersome task will increase soon. Therefore, the prediction of the car use will be certain at that time.
In addition to comfort, exorbitant living expense in the city makes people to live in the sub urban in the upcoming year. While, office work and other employment opportunities are always high in the city; so, it will be obvious that people will do the job in the urban. However, the inflating price of city living makes people run away from it and compel to choose the alternative solution: living in the sub urban. As the working place will be very far from the home and to be at the office at the time, people have only option to take a private means to get there regularly. Thus, necessity of private means brings the increase use of car after twenty years.
In conclusion, people after twenty years will have busy life and expensive life style; people may not afford the price of the living in the city. Thus, the increment of the private means like car will be certain solution for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun transportation seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much land transportation', 'a good deal of land transportation'.
Suggestion: much land transportation; a good deal of land transportation
...vil in life of the modern people. Among many land transportation, a vast number of people in the world w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54436450839 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48359059765 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446043165468 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6521442679 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.470588235 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372699290724 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13719797929 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935181507624 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242934114307 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980004706968 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.