In twenty years there will be fewer cars than there are these days
To thinks of roads without cars is tantamount to bringing back the universe to stone age. As years progresses, there is an increase in the technological advancement due to the innovations of mankind. hence, I disagree to the fact that in twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Firstly, when we date back to the 1900s, we witness the same television, mobile and computer which exists even today but with subtle differences. For example, the changes evident are the following: The transition from ordinary tv to LCD and LED tv could be seen clearly. Further, a simple mobile phone changed into an android or iPhone. Similarly, we saw the size of computer drastically getting reduced in the form of thin screens and laptops. thus, the cars run by fuel today could be in the form of solar or electric cars and hence there will not be decline in the number of cars, rather the same car would have been transformed into a modern one with special features.
Secondly, as time progresses people use a greater number of modern equipment’s and make life comfortable to live. History of mankind showcased earlier homes with manual cooking methodologies wherein modern houses are packed with items ranging from fridge to washing machine. Also, roads are becoming crowded and there is heavy traffic. Maybe in order to avoid such constraints, either flying cars or cars which could lift itself and move could be created. However, we cannot notice a decline in the cars running on the road.
thus, to conclude, we can sum up the points that technically, a car may evolve itself as a reliable source in many ways but decrease in its number is a question mark. hence, roads may witness more cars than what exists today but with different aspects for its longevity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...ment due to the innovations of mankind. hence, I disagree to the fact that in twenty ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...n the form of thin screens and laptops. thus, the cars run by fuel today could be in...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...e in the cars running on the road. thus, to conclude, we can sum up the points ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...rease in its number is a question mark. hence, roads may witness more cars than what ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85667752443 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60510575311 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592833876221 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2873766297 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236556166741 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723879466537 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10580971761 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153204847987 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100161989495 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.