In the 21st century, cars have become an integral part of society and are considered as necessary as commodities such as clothes, cellphones and computers. At present, in India, every middle-class family has at least one car while the upper-class family has a minimum of two vehicles. As the income level rises and middle-class families shift to the upper class, the number of cars is not going to drop anytime soon. Hence, I believe that in the next 20 years, cars will not be less than today rather be multifold. Several reasons support my position.
Firstly, although inter-city travel has become more common than before, public transport has not improved at a similar pace. As public transport requires thousands of approvals and the government changes every five years, it is highly unlikely that public transport will improve. Consequently, people who live on the outskirts of the city will continue to travel by their cars to the workplaces.
Secondly, there is no immediate replacement for automobiles. Although scooters and motorbikes seem to be a strong contender to take their place and move people faster from one place to another, their use will still be limited. It is because they are relatively complicated to drive and at the same time are prone to accidents. This limits their penetration into the market, and people continue to rely on cars as their primary means of transportation.
In conclusion, considering the facts mentioned above and the current scenarios, it is not hard to believe that automobile will not continue to rise rather decline in the next 20 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 263.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04942965779 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81685157701 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5736150221 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.153846154 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220206488781 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681886936228 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883830353166 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109264405127 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507196494609 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.