The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vocation programs. Which one do you think is better for students?
1) Take some college courses in advance. e.g. some courses that are related to students' major.
2) Visit some history museums or historical relics.
Students always feel confused before they go to university. And the university offers two programs. I consider that the best way to reduce it is taking some major courses in advance.
Studying the major courses will help students understand their own specialties and adapt their university study life fast. It is comment that many students do not know what their major study. And they also need a long time study to know it. It will waste too much time. So to avoid this situation, student can study some major to learn about what they will study in future. For example, one student major in electrical engineering and the automatization specialty, he usually does not know what the specialty is and he will study. And the university always uses the first year to teach him what electrical engineering and the automatization is. It will waste a half year. It is not so favorable. So the better way is having the classes in advance.
Studying the major courses will help students plan their own college study life. It is important for a freshman. If freshmen can plan their study life, they will have a relaxing life. And if they have clear goals, nothing can tempt them, such as the works of students union. For example, if they take part in the students union blindly, they can balance with the study and works. And they cannot get anything in the end. So freshmen should plan their study life well.
Admittedly, I’m not saying that visit some history museums or historical relics have no better impact for the students. That’s because playing before arriving in university may make us lose the power to learn and we may can’t catch out the knowledge. Compared with taking some college courses in advance. It’s more reasonable for the freshman to follow that.
To sum up, it is better for students to study some major courses in advance.
- The only reason for people working hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to t 73
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship because being away from people reminds us of how important they are Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with
- Many companies provide important products and services but at the same time cause environment damages. Some people believe the best way to prevent these companies from damaging the environment is for the government to require more penalties from them, suc 70
- governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic games 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...jor to learn about what they will study in future. For example, one student major in elec...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, well, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.815625 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43571849962 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490625 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1867600097 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.64 100.406767564 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8 20.6045352989 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309662496739 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931464732145 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933725666806 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23368434108 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831395883904 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.